[Carbon-dev] [Carbon-commits] [Carbon-Features] svn commit r55750 - in trunk/carbon/features/registry: . activities activities/org.wso2.carbon.registry.activities.feature activities/org.wso2.carbon.registry.activities.server.feature activities/org.wso2.carbon

[Ruwan Linton]

Senaka Fernando wrote:
> Hi Ruwan,
>
> I did this due to a few reasons.
>
> 1. Not all components had this.
Not acceptable. Most of the components had this and even have this for 
the moment.
> 2. The project names are very long already (once this is added it 
> becomes even longer).
We should be naming the components with a name (of course which has to 
be self explanatory), there is a section called description to have the 
long descriptions. ;-)
> 3. The maven reactor summary (build report) looks very much 
> disorganized due to the lengthy names if we had it.
I personally do not think we should loose consistency, because of a 
maven reactor summery being disorganized.
> 4. We don't have a convention about pom naming, and I did not hesitate 
> to remove it.
My fault, I didn't communicate, I have renamed all (most of it) 
components with the last vacation build preparation to have this 
convention. I think I verbally communicated this when we were on the 
feature hackethon though.
>
> So, I believe that we need to discuss how we are going to name our 
> feature poms, and also make it point to find the best way to shorten 
> the project names (ex:- Governance Lifecycle Management Server 
> Feature, or Registry Handler Config Feature Aggregator Module), by 
> removing the unnecessary parts. Once that has been done, we can add 
> this. WDYT?
I agree we can remove, "Module" part from the "Aggregator Module", I am 
the one who introduced this part to all top level poms, again in the 
last vacation with the maven structure refactoring :-). Module is 
redundant it is any way a maven module and do not need to explicitly name it

Thanks,
Ruwan
>
> Thanks,
> Senaka.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan at wso2.com 
> <mailto:ruwan at wso2.com>> wrote:
>
>     Senaka, all carbon components have the convention to start with
>     the component name "WSO2 Carbon - ". Why do we want to get rid of
>     the Carbon part for Registry.
>
>     I know there are few bundles which doesn't have this, but IMHO we
>     should add "WSO2 Carbon -" for all the components.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Ruwan
>
>
>     <mailto:senaka at wso2.com>
>
-- 
Ruwan Linton
Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
email: ruwan at wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097
blog: http://blog.ruwan.org

Lean . Enterprise . Middleware