Backstage vs Choreo

Backstage and Choreo cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle. Here's a breakdown to help you choose the right tool.

Backstage, an open source framework originating from Spotify, is designed for organizations to build highly customizable developer portals. Its strength lies in its flexibility, allowing enterprises to unify disparate infrastructure tooling, services, and documentation into a tailored, centralized interface. This approach empowers developers through self-service capabilities and promotes a "docs as code" methodology.

Choreo, is a fully managed, AI-native internal developer platform (IDP) as a service. Choreo's core value proposition is to abstract away the complexities of cloud native infrastructure, providing robust built-in automation and integrating artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities across the entire software development lifecycle. This design is optimized for efficiency, continuous innovation, and rapid time-to-market.

The key difference lies in their models: Backstage is a DIY framework needing heavy setup and maintenance, while Choreo is a fully managed platform with automated workflows, built-in API management, integration, and AI-native tools.

Feature Comparison

	Backstage	Choreo
Target audience	Organizations that possess a strong, mature internal platform engineering team and have a significant budget allocated for dedicated full-time equivalents (FTEs) to build and maintain their IDP.	Organizations that prioritize rapid time-to-market for cloud native applications and prefer to reduce operational overhead by abstracting infrastructure complexity, while leveraging built-in security, observability, and out-of-the-box completeness.
Platform Model	Open source framework for building internal developer portals (IDPs) Requires self-hosting or managed service provider	Fully managed internal developer platform as a service
Core Purpose	Consolidate developer tools, services, and documentation into a unified interface Empower self-service Docs as code	Streamline cloud native app lifecycle Reduce platform engineering costs AI-native Accelerate time-to-market
Operational Model	DIY Significant internal engineering investment for setup Customization Maintenance	Fully managed service Automates developer workflows Handles platform maintenance and infrastructure management
Software Catalog	Centralized Unified metadata source for all software components (microservices, APIs, data pipelines, ML models) Extensible data model (kinds, types, relationships)	Secure internal marketplace for discovering and reusing internal components Fosters transparency and efficiency with granular access control
CI/CD and Deployment Automation	Integrates with third-party CI/CD tools Manual setup and configuration of pipelines required.	One-click deployments Automated CI/CD with Argo workflows compatible CI (or bring your own CI) Built-in CD for multi-environment deployments Multi-cloud deployments
Multi-Cloud and Kubernetes Support	Requires custom integration with Kubernetes and cloud provider Requires longer setup times	Native multi-cloud Kubernetes support (AWS, Azure, GCP, OpenShift, VMWare Tanzu) Deploys across environments Supports self-service data planes (beta)
AI Capabilities	Lacks native AI Relies on plugins for AI-augmented engineering, vector databases, LLM integration Requires additional integration effort	Built-in AI-powered Co-Pilot Automated testing GenAI-ready stack (vector DBs, GenAI API connections, MCP server support) AI-driven FinOps
Scaling and High Availability	Requires manual setup and third-party tools, increasing complexity	Automated scaling (including scale-to-zero) Built-in failover High availability Optimizes resource usage and reduces costs
Technical Documentation	TechDocs: "docs as code" (Markdown files co-located with code) Automatically rendered in portal	Integrated documentation within Developer Portal AI-assisted documentation (Choreo Co-Pilot)
Observability and Troubleshooting	Integrates with third-party tools (Grafana, OpenTelemetry, Dynatrace) Manual setup/maintenance required DORA metrics via plugins	Real-time monitoring Logs Metrics Distributed tracing DORA metrics Cost insights Custom alerts Anomaly detection
Security and Compliance	Security via third-party integrations, custom configuration required RBAC via plugins Audit logs via Auditor Service	Enterprise-grade built-in security Zero trust architecture (eBPF, Cilium, WireGuard) OAuth mTLS Encryption RBAC Container scanning Runtime protection Secure secrets/config management Audit logs
API Management	API documentation and discovery Full lifecycle management and sharing require additional integrations	Full lifecycle API management API gateway Developer portal Marketplace Easy API sharing
Developer Experience	Requires developers to navigate and maintain a complex ecosystem of plugins and integrations Can slowdown development	Frictionless DevEx with intuitive UI Deep integration with popular tools (VSCode, GitHub, GitLab) Polyglot environments

Key Differentiators

The Backstage vs. Choreo comparison highlights deeper strategic differences beyond just features.

Backstage	Choreo
Build vs. Buy: Strategic IDP Choice
Backstage offers maximum control through a DIY approach. This flexibility comes with high internal costs often requiring multiple engineers, high cost in setup and maintenance. Organizations must manage infrastructure, integrations, and ongoing updates in-house.	Choreo, on the other hand, is a fully managed extensible platform. It abstracts infrastructure complexity, automates workflows, and frees teams to focus on business logic. This results in faster time-to-market and lower operational overhead.
AI Integration: Native vs. Plugin-Based
Backstage supports AI through plugins, offering flexibility but requiring teams to manage and integrate them manually.	Choreo is AI-native, with built-in capabilities like Choreo Co-Pilot, vector databases, AI-driven FinOps, and MCP server support—all integrated out of the box for better performance, security, and developer experience.
Operational Overhead: In-House vs. Managed
Backstage demands ongoing effort from cross-functional teams—DevOps, frontend, full-stack engineers, and product managers to maintain and evolve the platform.	Choreo reduces operational burden by managing CI/CD, scaling, observability, and security for you. This frees engineering talent to focus on product development, not platform maintenance.
Flexibility vs. Built-In Productivity
Backstage provides deep customization, ideal for orgs with highly unique needs—but it comes at the cost of building and maintaining everything yourself.	Choreo offers an out-of-the-box platform with everything enterprises need: CI/CD, security, observability, and AI. This speeds up adoption while reducing the need for heavy customization.

Conclusion

Backstage and Choreo represent two fundamentally different approaches to internal developer platforms. Backstage offers deep customization and control, ideal for organizations with the engineering capacity to build and maintain their own IDP. However, this comes with high total cost of ownership and operational overhead.

Choreo, by contrast, is a fully managed, AI-native IDP-as-a-service. It’s designed for enterprises that prioritize speed, scalability, and reduced operational complexity. With built-in CI/CD, observability, security, and AI features, Choreo shifts the burden from internal teams to the platform—enabling faster delivery and a more predictable cost model.

Ultimately, the decision hinges on strategy, resources, and appetite for complexity. As AI integration and developer productivity become critical to success, managed platforms like Choreo are likely to play a larger role in the future of software delivery and platform engineering.

Open Source

SaaS

API Management

Open Source

SaaS

Integration

Open Source

SaaS

Identity and Access
Management

Open Source

SaaS

Internal Developer Platform

SaaS

Backstage vs Choreo

Feature Comparison

Backstage

Choreo

Key Differentiators

Backstage

Choreo

Build vs. Buy: Strategic IDP Choice

AI Integration: Native vs. Plugin-Based

Operational Overhead: In-House vs. Managed

Flexibility vs. Built-In Productivity

Conclusion

Ready to Explore Choreo?

WSO2 for Startups

Sign Up and Get Started

Products

API Management

Integration

Identity and Access Management

Internal Developer Platform

Solutions

Resources

Support

Company

Follow us